| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
33
   |
Posted - 2012.01.23 20:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
supersexysucker wrote:Joe SMASH wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Nerf moons, 0.0 has no effort moons, highsec has effort incrusions... you want to nerf incrusions... then get around to them moons too...
Takes what, 1 falcon to screw a whole fleet in an incrusion... billions in loses... takes um what, 1000 people to even try to attack a tech moon. Can't really say risk vs reward now can we?
Also nerf chain ratting if that is still around since all these 0.0 bears seem to want to nerf HS more danger isk.
rofl. If 0.0 moons take no effort, why don't you take a few for yourself? After all, according to you, it's risk free! And calling a high sec incursion risky is laughable at best and completely moronic at worst. So whats the effort again? You launch a tower, than after tmw won't even be work to fuel... and let it mine money. In order to lose said tower you need like 1000 people to attack you (so ya, kinda why I don't take a few myself!). Incrusions you need to work as a fleet, need logis who are paying attention, need to warp around to different sites, beat other fleets who are in said site (or find another) You need one falcon to jam your logis and boom, likely 2-3bill MIN lose. Ya that moon goo is really risky hard work! Now that I see it all laied out... how foolish I was to call it easy!  Your nerf idiots are just that, any SMART eve player is just going to do what makes the most isk/h if you nerf incrusions to lvl 4 isk levels... most are just gona go run those easy lvl 4's... If you nerf vanguards... everyone will just run the new better site... either make everything = of deal with the fact players are going to be drawn to the most isk/h things.
Obvious troll is obvious. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
When writing :words: on the internet it really helps if you sum up your thesis in one sentence at the beginning of the post. I think yours is something like 'darius lost a ship in an ad-hoc shitfleet therefore incursions are really dangerous', but it's hard to tell.
Once you have your thesis, then you use supporting arguments. These are the things that are appropriate to be of paragraph length. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 03:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Recoil Happens wrote:Ispia Jaydrath wrote:When writing :words: on the internet it really helps if you sum up your thesis in one sentence at the beginning of the post. I think yours is something like 'darius lost a ship in an ad-hoc shitfleet therefore incursions are really dangerous', but it's hard to tell. Once you have your thesis, then you use supporting arguments. These are the things that are appropriate to be of paragraph length. lol - good try to demean the great post - gee I thought this was a forum, not a dissertation committee. sorry you are unable to focus for the two minutes it takes to read a great post. A.D.D. much?
I'm sure it was a wonderful post, whatever it was about. I am sorry for my obvious inadequacies and promise not to encourage clear and concise communication in the future. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 03:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rocket Rose wrote:120 + posts and you found one that needs work... it wouldn't have anything to so with how you feel about incursions would it? try, try real hard, you can understand it - what a victory it will be for you overcoming your deficits to be able to understand a few paragraphs
I'm sorry, I really would like to know what the post means but my mental capacity is just inadequate. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
34
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 04:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Miss Congenialty wrote:Ispia Jaydrath wrote:Rocket Rose wrote:120 + posts and you found one that needs work... it wouldn't have anything to so with how you feel about incursions would it? try, try real hard, you can understand it - what a victory it will be for you overcoming your deficits to be able to understand a few paragraphs I'm sorry, I really would like to know what the post means but my mental capacity is just inadequate. oh could you try to understand these two simple sentences - use Google define for the big words. The risk/reward paradigm is not broken by demonstrated skill. That paradigm does not include a certainty of loss, only a risk of loss. when you have finished reading, turn off your computer and singlehandedly raise the collective IQ of the internet and rid it of one troll. Not even self-deprecation can mask a fool
Why are you being mean to me just because I'm dumb?
Anyway, Einstein said that unless you can explain something to your grandmother, you don't really understand it. This means that people I can't understand aren't worth listening to. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
36
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tian Nu wrote:Why fix something that is not broken? Or do you admit you released broken incursion content?
Because CCP isn't know for releasing broken content. |
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
36
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 02:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tian Nu wrote:Ispia Jaydrath wrote:Tian Nu wrote:Why fix something that is not broken? Or do you admit you released broken incursion content? Because CCP isn't know for releasing broken content. not something that did not get fixed in over year + the incursion works exactely as it should no bugs at all. i seen many extension from 2005 (you remember pach when actualy you cant log in the game for 2 or 3 days) incursion are working proprely you dont like it run lvl 4 dont like it run lvl 5 dont like it run plex dont like it run cosmos dont like it do the Ark dont like it do market trading dont like it unsub, why it always need to be nerf nerf nerf so ppl can buy PLEX again ? nerf incursion and am dedicating all my ISK to bumping plex prices up (and i dont need to buy all of them) just every time they go down by 50 mill i buy 10 and bump it by 100 mill up it will eventualy and up by ppl leaving EvE (the one that sub whith plex) or ppl paying whith real money i warn CCP to think deeple about this incursion staff there is ppl that actualy can screw thinks in EvE whith out firing single boulet.
So you are asserting that eve has no features over a year old which are unbalanced or could use iteration?
I am pleased to hear that you think technetium and faction warfare are fine as they are, though I am puzzled by your support of the dominion sovereignty system and your opposition to the pos management changes.
Also, this web page might interest you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuation |
| |
|